Friday, September 26, 2008

Why everybody who is studying law should kill themselves right now

I feel strange writing this, as I don't actually study law. But hey. A request is a request. If you have any others, feel free to lodge your request in comment form. I think there's two others I have to write first, but I will get around to you eventually.

NB: Yes, I did study legal, I do know that in Australia there are no such things as "lawyers". But seriously, it gets hella annoying writing "barristers/solicitors" in every point. Lawyers is so much quicker. So just...for the next five minutes (or however long it takes you to read this) pretend you're American. Thank you. Much appreciated.

NBB: No offence is intended to any law students or wannabe law students. Blame Jess. It's all her fault.

10 Reasons Why Everybody Studying Law Should Kill Themselves:
  1. Law is a shit and unnecessarily difficult course, therefore all those studying it would actually be doing themselves a favour.
  2. Law is a shit and unnecessarily expensive course, and it's highly likely that (unless by some freako chance you actually score a decent, high-paying job...but the odds of that a slim, as there are too many lawyers, and not enough of said decent, high-paying jobs...) your children's children's children will still be trying to pay back your uni fees. Save them the pain.
  3. There are too many lawyers/solicitors/barristers out there. Seriously. We don't need any more.
  4. The world would actually be a better place without lawyers/barristers/solicitors in it. I mean, think about it. Firstly, lawyers are the scum of the earth. That's one point. And secondly, people might ACTUALLY be forced to solve their own problems. In family law matters, this would be particularly good, as everyone would stop sueing each other for ridiculous reasons, and thereby might actually develop some common decency.
  5. The absence of these people would mean more available resources for the rest of the students at UOW. In other words, less people hogging up space in the UniBar, library, duck ponds and coffee facilities, greater access to hard-to-steal outdoor tables and chairs, and more classrooms available so that people in the, say, Education department, don't have to have classes in the shitty demountables at the back of the uni (read: middle of nowhere).
  6. No law students (and hence, no lawyers) could potentially cause a raise in the wages/salaries of other occupations. Seriously, lawyers earn way too much. That money could be better spent on providing other occupations with a higher pay packet, such as TEACHERS or nurses or whatever, considering that their services are exponentially more valuable.
  7. There would be a decrease in the amount of shitty law-themed movies and television shows. If there were no law students, there would be no lawyers, and therefore everyone would eventually forget what a lawyer actually is. Which would swiftly put an end to shitty court-room dramas, and excessively long movies of a similar variety. A prime example of this would mean no more films like Philadelphia. And that would not be a loss AT ALL.
  8. The rainforests would be saved. Have you ever seen those law text books?? There is easily five trees worth of paper contained in each one. If law students killed themselves, then we wouldn't need to produce the text books anymore, and thus trees around the world would be saved. PLUS everything that solicitors/barristers do in the future need to be recorded on paper. PAPER. And when you consider how many disputes there are daily, that's a hell of a lot of paper. Again, pointless waste of natural resources.
  9. Global warming and climate change effects would be minimised, if not eventually reversed. See above. If we weren't killing the trees, then would still be available to offset carbon dioxide emissions, and our world wouldn't be doomed to hell.
  10. And finally... No one worth knowing studies law, so it's really no loss at all.
Really.

(Bahahahahahahahaaaa.)

:)

6 comments:

Annie said...

wow.

bold statements savanna.

i must say... i now have quite a bad view of law which i feel is somewhat influenced by this blog. I never knew studying law was so evil. I was actually thinking about taking an elective in it, now I'm like HECCCKK NO.

Thank you for enlightening me about this serious issue... I love having someone to blame for the world's problems. Damn lawyers!

ps. great to see you back again!!!!!!! xoxoxo

Annie said...

ps. thats ok. I'm the best follower you could possibly have.

ahem. I would follow you to the mooon and back if you'll beee...if you'll beee my beeh-beee!!! ;)

Hey r you free anytime next week to do stuff???

Jessmindalala said...

Firstly, you did do legal studies, so you should know that "lawyer" just means anyone who practices law... so there are lawyers in Australia :S

Nextly, Because I like to argue (it must be the lawyer in me):

1. Yeah okay with the unnecessarily difficult part, but it's not shit, it's really quite interesting, challenging, and face it, I'm going to graduate knowing more than youuuu :)

2. No argument there.

3. Actually, no there's not. There's demand for specialist lawyers and society is becoming more and more litigous, meaning everyone wants a lawyer.

4. If people wanted to solve their own problems, they wouldn't go to lawyers in the first place.

5. Suck tin. We win.

6. Oh, so you're proposing increased tax? Yeah, everyone will love that...

7. Yeah, okay. Legally Blonde sucked. But I liiiiiiked Philadelphia :(

8. Let's not forget about my poor shoulders, having to carry around all the paper. Buuuut on the other hand, eventually courtrooms will be paperless; everything will be electronic. And besides, what about all the paper used in primary school classrooms, hmm? For cutting and gluing and no real productive purpose at all? Yeah.

9. God, way to be over-dramatic.

10. :(

Yes I know I just argued against myself but whateverrrr.
Nice blog.
Lol I'll think of another topic for you in the near future <3

Annie said...

lol at the stupidity of the whole situation....you guys just wrote a blog for the purpose of arguing.

although i must say valid points are made by jessica...I thinnk I'm moved from Anti-lawyer to neutral again.

Savvv. said...

No, see this is the stupidity of the situation. Jess ASKED me to make a blog saying why law students should kill themselves. So really, in essence, she's arguing against herself.

..fun to write, though. :P

To retaliate though... (HA)

1. If it's so interesting, then why is it that you strive to avoid lectures at every available opportunity?

2. WIN.

3. That's just an urban legend. They simply don't want to demoralise you.

4. Society is messed up, okay. Nobody knows what they want. I think 90% of people use lawyers (again, mainly in family law) because it is seriously over-glamourised in the media. That, and so that they can have the joy of saying "You'll be hearing from my lawyer, bitch!" ...or something of the like.

5. Loser. I don't even remember what this point was.

6. When did I propose increased taxes? DON'T TWIST MY WORDS YOU LAWYER. :P

7. Legally Blonde... *SHUDDER*

8. Cutting and gluing are essential motor skills that all people are required to learn. Plus, all primary schools in the Illawarra region have set up recycling facilities within the school, to ensure that no paper is wasted, but is actually reused and made into...I 'unno. Toilet paper or something. UNLIKE LAW RECORDS WHICH JUST SIT ON SHELVES. Tut tut. And electronic shmelectronic. What's going to happen if there's a blackout? Or a virus in the system? Or something of the like? That's right. You'll all be screwed. Literally. With giant chrome metal wangs.

(Okay, that was a quote, which odds are, you're not going to get at all. But for ME it's funny. :P)

9. What, you seriously expected me to come up with 10 whole reasons WITHOUT using some major exaggeration?? Yeesh. As if.

10. WIN.



Wow, anyone reading this would think I have a really strong opinion on the issue. And I really don't. Huh. Apparently I can argue against anything.

Matty said...

Wow ..
I already had a negative perspective on law. This just took it to the limit.

Btw, you win ... Jess has nothing on this argument :D